13 Jul From a Political “Yawn” to an Educational Shout: How the New Housing Bill Could Improve Our Schools
For fans of political dramas like House of Cards who revel in the behind-the-scenes machinations of Washington, the passage of the federal housing bill provided a masterclass in political theater. Despite being a genuinely bipartisan measure that even the President initially praised, its final enactment was dismissed as a “yawn” and didn’t get a Rose Garden celebration.
But beyond the Washington optics, this legislation known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act carries significant, overlooked potential for a completely different sector: the alternative education community.
The Media Blindspot: Housing vs. Education
Affordable housing dominates the headlines, and rightly so. It is a critical national issue. However, there is a stark disparity in how the media covers affordable housing versus how it covers school choice, despite the two sectors serving almost identical numbers of groups, often with overlapping individuals.
Federally subsidized affordable housing units: 5 million
Charter school students: 4 million
Many of the children enrolled in charter schools are the exact same children living in subsidized affordable housing. Yet, education infrastructure rarely enjoys the same policy momentum or public spotlight as housing development. The question we must ask is: Can we leverage this new housing bill to support quality education?
While rewriting the bill to insert direct education subsidies is off the table, the legislation intentionally flattens the barriers to community redevelopment. By stepping out of traditional education silos and actively partnering with affordable housing developers, school leaders can leverage two powerful provisions buried within the bill.
- The RESIDE Act: Co-Location & Capital Sharing
Charter schools have a long history of getting creative with real estate, frequently converting old strip malls, warehouses, and office buildings into functional classrooms. The housing bill supercharges this strategy through a provision called the Revitalizing Empty Structures Into Desirable Environments (RESIDE) Act.
- The Provision: The RESIDE Act creates a pilot grant program specifically designed to fund the conversion of vacant commercial or industrial buildings into affordable housing.
- How to Leverage It: This opens the door for innovative, mixed-use co-location partnerships. A charter school network can partner with an affordable housing developer to acquire a large, vacant commercial property. The developer utilizes RESIDE grants to fund the site acquisition, remediation, and residential conversion of the upper floors, while the charter school funds and builds out its educational campus on the ground level.
The Big Benefit: This structural partnership splits the massive upfront capital burden of land acquisition, making school expansion drastically more affordable.
- Incentives for Local Zoning Reform
The single greatest hurdle for both affordable housing and charter schools isn’t always funding, it’s local bureaucracy. Both sectors regularly run into the brick wall of NIMBYism manifesting as grueling, expensive zoning and permitting battles.
- The Provision: The bill establishes a $200 million annual competitive grant program for local and tribal governments that can prove they are actively increasing housing supply through streamlined permitting, density bonuses, and flexible zoning changes.
- How to Leverage It: For those old enough to remember the “Race to the Top” initiative, the strategy here is identical. By dangling a large pool of cash that not everyone can win, the federal government incentivizes every competing municipality to rewrite their rigid local planning codes.
The Big Benefit: Education advocates must collectively pressure competing municipalities to include Blanket Education Zoning for all local properties within their grant applications. Blanket education zoning would automatically permit any property within a municipality to be used as an educational facility. This would eliminate the costly special-use permits and weaponized zoning delays that routinely kill school developments before they can break ground.
The Inseparable Link Between Home and School
Why should a housing bill care about education infrastructure? Because housing policy is education policy. The link between where a child lives and where they learn is still unbreakable, even after COVID’s attempt to push us all into a virtual world.
- The Premium: Neighborhoods tied to high-performing school districts command up to a 20% premium on housing costs simply because parents are desperate to secure a good education for their children.
- The Refusal: Low-income families will actively turn down affordable housing options and choose to pay exorbitant, draining rent elsewhere if the local neighborhood school system is failing.
- The Sacrifice: In the most heartbreaking scenarios, families will choose to sleep in their cars overnight just so their children can establish residency in a safer, higher-performing district.
Building affordable housing in a neighborhood devoid of quality educational options does not solve root-cause poverty; it merely anchors a family to a broken system. A robust housing strategy must include policies that strengthen the educational programs surrounding those homes.
A Rising Tide for All Alternative Learning
This opportunity isn’t exclusive to charter schools. Implementing blanket education zoning and mixed-use spaces creates a rising tide for the entire modern educational ecosystem, opening immediate doors for:
- Microschools looking to set up affordable hubs in commercial spaces.
- Private schools seeking to expand into high-need neighborhoods.
- Learning pods and homeschool co-ops seeking dedicated, community-centric facilities.
- Traditional school districts in growing cities that still face local red tape when trying to construct new buildings.
It is time for education advocates, housing developers, and community development banks to align. Let’s collaborate to take what the administration dismissed as a “yawn” of a housing bill, and turn it into a loud, transformative “shout” for educational freedom and community development.
No Comments